NOM strategy: drive a wedge into the black community

NOM’s wedge strategy is out of an old anti-civil rights playbook

To those distressed by the revelation that the National Organization for Marriage has a deliberate "game plan" to enlist blacks in their efforts to prevent marriage equality:

I remember comparable efforts during the height of the Civil Rights Movement. Then, there were those who sought to enlist blacks to support efforts to prevent racial integration. And when I read of the desire of NOM "to drive a wedge between gays and blacks - two key Democratic constituencies." (New York Times, 3/27/12), I thought of what it would mean if they were successful in doing that. We who are black were being urged by NOM to separate ourselves from Bayard Rustin, Barbara Jordan, James Baldwin, Wanda Sykes, Rev. Yvette Flunder, Don Lemon, Sheryl Swoopes, Countee Cullen, Johnny Mathis, and many, many other black lesbians and gay men, living and dead. The contradiction of any group that seeks to drive a wedge in the "family" of a group of people who share a common racial history and heritage is beyond belief.

But, the narrow and demeaning perspective that many of those in the anti-marriage equality movement have of same-gender loving persons causes me not to be surprised that for them, black LGBTQ persons are rendered invisible. One of the disturbing realties in these moments when gay rights are moving forward is that organizations like NOM, and sadly some gay rights organizations, at times give the impression that there are no black gay persons or gay communities. This is compounded when some black persons within the church and beyond the church appear to be so anti-marriage equality and often anti-gay that they forget that they are limiting the rights of the black persons in their/our families, churches and communities who are gay.

The resistance to marriage equality for same-sex couples has given me moments when I have remembered the wisdom of that sage Yogi Berra who said, "It's déjà vu all over again." The National Organization for Marriage is not unlike those persons and groups who in another time were anti-interracial marriage. These persons and groups used Scripture, culture, history and the "protection of traditional marriage" as rationales for their opposition, particularly, to the marriage of a black person to a white person. NOM, you are a living illustration of the cliché, "THE MORE THINGS CHANGE, THE MORE THEY REMAIN THE SAME." Shame on you!

This post was originally published on Methodists in New Directions.